On the other hand, the AOChas much better contrast, so blacks look black in a dark room instead of gray. The ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM is much better than the BenQ ZOWIE XL2546K. It's mainly limited by the monitor's low contrast ratio and lack of a wide color gamut. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is somewhat better than the Gigabyte AORUSAD27QD. We measure it by sending a Rec. The stand is relatively small and doesn't take up too much desk space. For most uses, the ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM is significantly better than the AOC CQ27G2. It's designed as a gaming monitor but doesn't stand out in an office environment. It appears to have the same hardware, but the stand is entirely black. Buy ASUS TUF Gaming 24.5 1080P HDR Monitor VG258QM - Full HD, 280Hz (Supports 144Hz), 0.5ms, Extreme Low Motion Blur Sync, G-SYNC Compatible, DisplayHDR 400, Rtings measured 35ms at 60Hz, meaning this monitor is unusable at 60Hz, and has over triple what most gaming monitors get (10ms or lower). Even though the ASUS scores slightly higher for gaming, the LG has much better response times, resulting in clearer images in fast-moving scenes. We tested the 23.8" ASUS TUF Gaming VG249Q1A monitor, but there's also a 27" version called the VG279Q1A, which we expect to perform very similarly. Thanks to its IPS panel, the image remains accurate at an angle, but blacks look gray in a dark room. Our unit was manufactured in January 2021; you can see the label here. It delivers a great gaming experience thanks to its fast refresh rate, low input lag, and excellent response time at any refresh rate, resulting in crystal clear motion with very little blur behind fast-moving objects. The edges of the screen are visibly darker, especially at the sides and at the top. Passable black uniformity for a monitor, and it's much better than the PG279QZ and VG279Q, but this could vary from unit to unit. The ProArtalso has a slightly wider color gamut andmore accurate colors out of the box, though this can vary between units. There's also a difference in supported variable refresh rates, as the PG279QM natively supports G-SYNC, resulting in a more visually consistent gaming experience if you have an NVIDIA graphics card. Unfortunately, this means you'll likely have to go into the monitor's menus and change your overdrive setting each time you switch to 60Hz, as there's no single mode that performs well at any refresh rate. The Acer Nitro XF243Y Pbmiiprx has exceptional response time at 60Hz. Gray uniformity is great, although this varies between units. The Acer Nitro XF243Y Pbmiiprx's build quality is decent, very similar to the Acer Nitro XF252Q. The Acer Nitro XF243Y and the Samsung Odyssey G9 are very different monitors. It's more suitable for an average-lit room as it can't get very bright and can't display deep blacks in a dark room. The stand is very basic, but there isn't much wobble due to the compact screen size. It has excellent DCI P3 coverage, the color space used in most HDR content, but its coverage of the wider Rec. It has HDR support, which the ASUS lacks, but it can't display a wide color gamut. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is a bit better overall than the Gigabyte G27Q. The input lag is remarkably low and the high resolution and screen real estate allow you to see more details of your gaming arena. It has a smaller screen than the LG, but this means it has a higher pixel density to display sharper images and text. Asus TUF VG259QM - 25" and 280hz so it's perfect for competitive gaming. The LG 27GL850-B is much better than the AOC CQ27G2 for most uses. The TN panel, however, doesn't offer a significant advantage, as the VG259QM is a bit better in most ways that matter. Overall, it doesn't feel particularly premium, but there are no issues with the construction. The AOC CQ27G2 has good overall build quality. This results in a lower but arguably more accurate measurement. This means you may have to change the overdrive setting if your game's frame rate drops. SEE PRICE. You can reach a maximum of 360Hz over a DisplayPort connection and 240Hz over an HDMI connection. The ASUS VG249Q1A's out-of-the-box accuracy is great. Sadly, it isn't well-suited for gaming in the dark due to its low contrast ratio and sub-par black uniformity. It also has a significantly faster response time, so motion looks smoother, and you can overclock its 144Hz refresh rate to 165Hz. The stand has an okay range of ergonomic adjustments, so it should be comfortable for most people. For more options, check out our recommendations for the best gaming monitors, the best 24-25 inch monitors, and the best gaming monitors under $200. The '100' option manages to reach 1ms gray-to-gray response time, but its total response time is slower, and it has a significant amount of overshoot. The ASUS gets brighter, supports HDR, has a quicker response time at 60Hz, anda higher max refresh rate. Only a few of the remaining inaccuracies can be spotted by the trained eye without the aid of a colorimeter. The ASUS is an inch bigger than the Acer. It's advertised to have an 8-bit panel, but we can achieve 10-bit in the EDID of the monitor, so it may be 8-bit with FRC, but we don't know for sure. The LG 27GN650-B and the ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM are both 1080pgaming monitors. The HDR peak brightness is okay. It supports HDR10; however, HDR content doesn't look significantly better than in SDR because itlacks a wide color gamut and local dimming. There are four buttons and a joystick, and they allow you to navigate the on-screen menu. Noticeable motion smearing in dark scenes. The LG 27GN650-B has a high refresh rate to deliver a smooth gaming experience. Its response time is faster too, and it has a Black Frame Insertion feature to further improve motion clarity. The monitor displays rich, saturated colors in most luminosities. The Acer has slightly better viewing angles and better accuracy out of the box. Monitors store-bought and tested, supported by you via. Unfortunately, there are some issues when using this monitor with a MacBook. Additionally, the Asus' refresh rate can be factory overclocked to 165Hz, providing a smoother gamingexperienceoverall. It supports HDR, whereas the VG249Q1A doesn't, but it doesn't add much because it can't display a wide color gamut. The video above is provided for reference only. If you're often in a well-lit room, the Acergets a bit brighter than the LG, but the LG has better reflection handling. The recommended overdrive setting is 'Fast'; it has a bit of overshoot in lighter transitions, but it's significantly less than the other settings. The ASUS TUF Gaming VG259Qm is much better than the ASUS TUF Gaming VG249Q1A for gaming. The VG27AQ has outstanding gray uniformity. It has near-full coverage of the commonly-used sRGB color space, but its coverage of the Adobe RGB color space is mediocre. Gaming-wise, the Samsung has a higher refresh rate of 240Hz, but the Acer has better response times. The ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM and the ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV are very different monitors. Refresh rates up to 120Hz work, but HDR only works at 60Hz. The back is plain except for the UltraGear branding and red accent ring. However, the BenQ's Black Frame Insertion feature works over a wider frequency range to reduce motion blur. The MSI has better connectivity, though, with a built-in USB hub and support for NVIDIA's Reflex Latency Analyzer. They both have similar motion handling but the ViewSonic has a more versatile backlight strobing feature as you can adjust the pulse width and phaseto your liking. Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available. The tilt range is fairly narrow, and it can't swivel at all. The ASUS TUF Gaming VG249Q1A and the ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV are very different monitors. On the other hand, the Dell has a faster refresh rate and better motion handling at the max refresh rate, making it a better choice for fast-paced shooters and MOBAs. The LG 27GN650-B and the ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM are both 1080pgaming monitors. The AOC CQ27G2 is a decent monitor for office use. so that you can compare the results easily. However, the VG27WQ1B has a VA panel with much better contrast, it has a quicker response time at 60Hz, and it displays a wide color gamut for HDR content. The Dell Alienware AW2521H is better than the BenQ ZOWIE XL2546K. This monitor doesn't have a local dimming feature. This mode is actually a hidden setting that has to be enabled through the service menu (find out how here). LEARN ABOUT RESPONSE TIME @ MAX REFRESH RATE. This tool will clearly show you the differences, Use our data and table to find the best monitor for your needs, Want to see us review a specific monitor? ASUS TUF Gaming VG279QM 27 HDR Monitor, 1080P Full HD (1920 simple and easy. The LG 27GN650-B has the same design as most other 2020 LG UltraGear monitors, like the LG 27GN850-B. The 27GL850-B has wider viewing angles, much faster response times, and higher peak brightness. It only allows for tilt adjustment. There are hardly any inaccuracies with white balance and most colors. If that's something you're interested in, then we recommend the ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM. The color temperature is very close to our 6500K target, just a bit on the cooler side. The Dell Alienware AW2521H has a decent vertical viewing angle. The ASUS VG249Q1A has exceptional response times at 60Hz. On the other hand, the VG279Q has better ergonomics, can get brighter, and has better reflection handling. You shouldn't have any issues if your room has a few lights, but if you place it across a large window then the reflections can be distracting. Like most IPS panels, the LG 27GN650-B has a mediocre contrast ratio, which makes blacks appear grayish when viewed in a dark environment. The LG also has wider viewing angles, better ergonomics, and gets a lot brighter to fight glare. The ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM and the ASUS TUF Gaming VG279QM are almost identical, as it's mostly a size difference between them. 11:20 . The ASUS has significantly better ergonomics, a bit better reflection handling, a wider BFI flicker range, and it has built-in speakers. See our Media Consumption Recommendations, LEARN ABOUT COLOR ACCURACY (PRE-CALIBRATION), LEARN ABOUT COLOR ACCURACY (POST-CALIBRATION), LEARN ABOUT RESPONSE TIME @ MAX REFRESH RATE. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is better for most uses than theMSI Optix G273QF, mainly because it has more features. The Gigabyte has alarger screen and higher resolution, and it offers more features, like USB-C input and a Picture-in-Picture mode. It also has a better HDR color gamut. It's hard to place the screen in a comfortable viewing position because it has terrible ergonomics. This isn't a good choice if your monitor isn't mounted at eye-level, or if you often share your screen with someone standing beside you. The screen may be too small for some, especially for multitasking; however, it keeps the pixel density high, so text and images look sharper. The viewing angles are good enough for sharing content with others as long as image accuracy isn't a priority. It still performs well in most well-lit environments; however, it may be best to avoid placing it opposite a window. It feels sturdy, and the screen doesn't wobble much. The Acer Nitro XF243Y Pbmiiprx has decent text clarity. Overall, the ASUS TUF VG27AQ is marginally better than the Lenovo Legion Y27q-20. The ASUS has much better ergonomics, making it easier to place in an ideal viewing position. There are a few extra features on the AOC CQ27G2: We tested the 27 inch AOC CQ27G2, which replaces the AOC CQ27G1, which we've also tested. The VG279QM is slightly better, as it has wider viewing angles, better color accuracy, andgets much brighter in HDR. The ASUS supports FreeSync, has much better ergonomics,better contrast and black uniformity,the out-of-box color accuracy is significantly better, and it supports HDR. put them under the same test bench, The ASUS TUF Gaming VG249Q1A is decent for most uses. It's suitable for most rooms, but might not be able to fight glare in a very bright room. It delivers a great gaming experience, with low input lag, excellent response time, and support for AMD's FreeSync variable refresh rate technology to reduce screen tearing, but it has very few additional gaming features. The ASUS also has a better contrast ratio and a significantly better black uniformity, but the Gigabyte has better color accuracy, can get brighter,and has much more extra features. If someone comes across a different type of panel or if their VG27AQ doesn't correspond to our review, let us know and we will update the review. It mostly has trouble with dark colors due to its low contrast ratio. The video above is provided for reference only. The Dell Alienware AW2521H has a better response time and higher refresh rate than the Gigabyte M27Q, but the difference might not be noticeable tocasual players. The Acer also has a wider color gamut in SDR and HDR. The LG 27GN880-B and the ASUS TUF VG27AQ are both 27 inch, 1440p monitors with an IPS panel. However, the ViewSonic has much better reflection handling and significantly better black uniformity. Note that the BFI score is based on the minimum and maximum frequency at which it operates, not the BFI's performance. While the Lepow Z1 Gamut and the Acer Nitro XF243Y Pbmiiprx are 1080p IPS monitors, they're for different uses. The matte anti-reflective coating does a great job of reducing the intensity of direct reflections but doesn't do as well when it comes to bright ambient lighting. If you want a 1440p monitor with a quicker response time, then look into the MSI Optix G273QF. The ASUS TUF Gaming VG249Q1A is great for gaming. The Dell has a higher refresh rate of 360Hz and a slightly better response time, resulting in smoother motion and greater responsiveness. The ASUS VG259QM has an excellent response time when playing at the maximum refresh rate of 280Hz, resulting in minimal motion blur in fast-moving scenes. The Dell Alienware AW2521H has poor black uniformity, but this may vary between units. It supports HDR, but can't downscale a 4k image. The LG 27GN650-B has great viewing angles, which means images remain accurate when viewed from the side, good for sharing content and playing co-op games. It also has a wider color gamut and delivers a more satisfying HDR experience. The video is provided for reference only. VIOTEK GFV24C - Great design and thin bezel. Overall, the ASUS TUF VG27AQ is marginally better than the ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is an excellent monitor for gaming. The ASUS' refresh rate is faster, which helps motion look smoother. It has thin bezels on three sides and a slightly thicker bottom bezel. Gamma follows the sRGB curve relatively well, but most dark scenes appear brighter than they should. It has decent reflection handling and wide viewing angles so you can enjoy a movie with a friend in a room that has a few lights without issue. Note that some tests, like the gray uniformity, may vary between individual units. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is a much better monitor than the ASUS TUF VG27VQ. It has a stand with a much wider swivel range, and it supports HDR. Overall, motion looks similar to other 144Hz VA monitors we've tested, like the LG 32GK650F-B and the Nixeus EDG 34. 2020 is sub-par. Though the Asus has a maximum refresh rate of 165Hz, it has a higher resolution, providing better picture quality, and is a better choice for multitasking. The color temperature is a bit warmer than before calibration, but it shouldn't be noticeable. Unfortunately, this monitor has very limited compatibility with the Xbox Series S|X. The ASUSdelivers a better gaming experience because it has a slightly higher refresh rate of 165Hz and much faster response times. G-SYNC compatibility only works over DisplayPort. That said, the Dell has a slightly faster response time at the max 360Hz, although they're about even at 60Hz. You can download our ICC profile calibration here. However, it doesn't support a wide color gamut, while the Lepow does. The LG 27GN650-B and the Gigabyte G27Q are both great 144Hz gaming monitors. The Samsung Odyssey G5 S27AG50 and the ASUS TUF VG27AQ are both excellent gaming monitors. Like with its SDR brightness, it's very consistent across different content. The Dell natively supports NVIDIA's G-SYNC variable refresh rate technology, so it's a bit better than the Acer if you have an NVIDIA graphics card, as it supports NVIDIA's Reflex Latency Analyzer as well as variable overdrive, ensuring a more visually consistent gaming experience. The ASUS gets brighter, its IPS panel has much wider viewing angles, and it has better motion handling due to its higher refresh rate and faster response time. The VG279QM has a faster response time, resulting in clearer motion with less blur, especially at 60Hz. Unfortunately, the AOC CQ27G2 that we tested has bad black uniformity. Here you can vote for our next review, Create or edit custom monitor ratings, your custom ratings will be present on the table tool, and other pages. This results in a smoother and more responsive gaming experience. The ASUShas an IPS panel with wide viewing angles, but the Dell's VA panel offers a much better contrast ratio, and it can also get brighter to fight glare in bright rooms. It also has great coverage of the Adobe RGB color space often used for professional photo editing. As for the ASUS, it feels better built, and it has much better ergonomics because it has a wider swivel range, and you can rotate it into portrait mode in both directions. However, If you use the monitor for work, the LG is better for text clarity. There's also a quick release button on the back. That said, it maintains the brightness very consistently across different content. Like at the max refresh rate, there's very little difference between the overdrive settings, and 'Strong' is still the best. The ASUS has a much higher refresh rate, much better motion handling, and supports FreeSync. It also has a better contrast ratio, wider viewing angles, and gets brighter to combat glare. The Acer is also better for bright room gaming because it gets brighter and has better reflection handling. It handles reflections very well, but its screen brightness is on the lower side, which means it might not be able to overcome intense glare in a bright, sunny room. We purchase our own monitors and It only has trouble displaying dark colors due to its low contrast ratio. Its motion handling is amazing thanks to its 165Hz refresh rate and superb response times. The USB 3.0 port is for firmware updates only. On the other hand, the VG32VQ's VA panel has a better contrast ratio, can get brighter, and has better reflection handling for bright room viewing, though its motion handling isn't as good. Driven by data, run by a passionate team of engineers, testers, technical writers, developers, and more. The ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM is a good monitor for media creation. The Acer Nitro XF243Y Pbmiiprx has a few additional features, including: We tested the 23.8 inchAcer Nitro XF243Y Pbmiiprx,also known as the Nitro XF3 Series. On the other hand, the Dell is a 1080p, 360Hz monitor with an IPS panel. The ASUS TUF VG259QM supports FreeSync variable refresh rate technology, and it's compatible with NVIDIA's G-SYNC Compatible mode which only works over a DisplayPort connection. The ASUS has a higher native resolution, resulting in much better text clarity and sharper images. The ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM and the Acer Predator X25 bmiiprzx are similar monitors. It's great for sharing your work with coworkers and clients thanks to its wide viewing angles. Overall, the Acer Nitro XF243Y is better than the Acer Nitro VG271 Pbmiipx. The back of this monitor has a gamer-oriented design with RGB lighting on the stand and the Alienware logo at the top right. If youcomeacross a different type of panelor your ASUS TUF Gaming VG249Q1A doesn't correspond to our review, let us know, and we'll update the review. Its compact screen size isn't super immersive, but it does make it easier to see the entire screen at once. It supports FreeSync natively and is compatible with G-SYNC to reduce screen tearing. SEE PRICE. For more options, check out our other recommendations for thebest gaming monitors, the best 1080p monitors, and the best budget gaming monitors. The screen's brightness is locked in this picture mode. There's no cable management. The main differences are that the HP has a smaller 24 inch screen, and it doesn't support HDR. However, the AOC has better ergonomics and a Black Frame Insertion feature to help improve motion clarity. The 60Hz response time is decent. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is an impressive 27 inch, 1440p monitor with excellent gaming performance. It's a bit slow to wake up from sleep mode, but that's not exclusive to Macs, and windows are restored to their original positions. There's banding in the darker shades of gray, red, and green. Build quality is better on the Acer, but the ASUS has better ergonomics, as it has a much wider swivel range. Text clarity is decent, mostly limited by the screen's pixel density. The VG27AQ has an optional backlight strobing feature to improve the appearance of motion, but it still doesn't look as good as the PG279QM. It has a gamer-oriented design with RGB lighting on the back. On the other hand, the AOC has better contrast, so it might be a better choice for a dark room. However, the AOC has a higher contrast ratio, better ergonomics, and better color accuracy out-of-the-box. For more options, check out our recommendations for the best gaming monitors, the best 144Hz monitors, and the best 1080p monitors. It has a square-shaped base with some red on it. If you want a gaming monitor with an even wider SDR color gamut, check out the ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQ. There's an sRGB mode, but we didn't use it because it's less accurate. If you want a monitor with an even higher refresh rate, check out the ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM. Note that some tests such as gray uniformity may vary between units. It delivers a great gaming experience, with low input lag, excellent response time, and support for AMD's FreeSync variable refresh rate technology to reduce screen tearing, but it has very few additional gaming features. The ASUS delivers a smoother and more responsive gaming experience because it has a higher refresh rate and faster response time. It also has FreeSync support and G-SYNC compatibility to reduce screen tearing. If intense glare is an issue and you need a monitor that gets brighter, check out the Gigabyte M27Q. It has HDR support, which the ASUS lacks, but it can't display a wide color gamut. The ASUS ProArt Display PA278CV and the ASUS TUF VG27AQ are from different series in ASUS's lineup. However, the Gigabyte has a larger, higher-resolution screen to provide greater immersion and more screen space for work and media consumption. Here you can vote for our next review, Create or edit custom monitor ratings, your custom ratings will be present on the table tool, and other pages. However, like most budget monitors, it lacks additional features such as USB ports, and it can't display a wide color gamut for HDR. Unfortunately, it has a low contrast ratio that makes blacks appear grayish in the dark, and its sub-par ergonomics make it hard to place the screen at a comfortable viewing position. The ASUS TUF VG249Q1A doesn't support HDR. On the other hand, the MSI is a bit bigger and has a VA panel, resulting in a much higher contrast ratio. It's great for gaming because it has a low input lag, a high refresh rate, and superb response times. The best overdrive setting is also 'Off' as the other settings are slower and have far too much overshoot. It handles reflections well but doesn't get very bright, so it's better suited for a moderately-lit room as it might not be able to overcome intense glare. Monitors store-bought and tested, supported by you via. The Acer gets brighter, has better reflection handling, and the ergonomics are significantly better. This allows it to produce deep blacks and crisp images. There's a dedicated sRGB mode color option that you can activate on top of the active Picture Mode, but it's slightly less accurate than the 'Standard' mode. The Dell Alienware AW2521H is excellent for gaming. If you have an AMD graphics card and want FreeSync support, check out the Dell Alienware AW2523HF. The ASUS uses an IPS panel, which results in better viewing angles, but worse contrast. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is slightly better than the Dell S2721DGF overall, but the Dell might be a better choice. One of the USB inputs can be used for power delivery, so you can charge your mobile devices, but it doesn't work when the monitor is off. It has an outstanding SDR color gamut, with great coverage of the Adobe RGB color space, and excellent uniformity with no noticeable color bleed. The ASUS TUF Gaming VG249Q1A doesn't support HDR. It also supports HDR and a wide color gamut. On the other hand, the TUF supports HDR. The AOC CQ27G2 has a decent black frame insertion feature. It performs well in bright rooms thanks to its impressive peak brightness and good reflection handling. Uniformity is much better in near-dark scenes. They both have a 24" IPS screen with a 1080p resolution and a native 144Hz refresh rate, except that you can overclock the ASUS up to 165Hz. It easily gets bright enough to combat glare, and it maintains its brightness very consistent across different content. We measured BFI input lag at its max flicker frequency of 240Hz. Can't display deep blacks in a dark room. The TUF Gaming VG27AQ monitor has decent reflection handling. The LG has significantly better ergonomics, but it still doesn't allow for swivel adjustment. The ASUS TUF VG259QM is a good monitor for office use. The LG 27GN650-B is a great budget gaming monitor with exceptional response times. Overall, the ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM is better than the ASUS VG279Q. Unfortunately, the stand doesn't swivel at all. 120Hz refresh rates work, but only at 1080p. In Europe, the CQ27G2U is the equivalent model. The color temperature is on the cold side, giving the image a blueish tint. The image is noticeably blurrier than at max refresh rate, and there's slightly more ghosting due to a couple of slow transitions. The AOC CQ27G2 has the same control scheme as the older AOC CQ27G1, but they've changed the buttons a bit. The Dell is a 25 inch 1080p monitor with a 360Hz refresh rate, aimed at competitive gamers who want the best possible motion clarity. The LG 27GN650-B's vertical viewing angles aren't bad, but there's still some loss of image accuracy when viewing from below or above. It has a1440p resolution but it has a high 165Hz refresh rate, while the LG has a 4k panel, but a 60Hz refresh rate. Unfortunately, even though it supports HDR, it doesn't display a wide color gamut for HDR content and can't get bright enough to bring out highlights. The LG, on the other hand, has a faster response time, so fast-moving content has almost no blur, making the lack of BFInot an issue. The AOC has a higher 1440p resolution compared to the Dell's 1080p, making it a better choice if you also use it for work, but its response time isn't as good as the Dell's, especially in dark scenes. It's made entirely out of plastic, and it feels solid throughout. It has decent reflection handling, but it might not be bright enough if there's a lot of natural light. Videos for related products. The SDR peak brightness is decent. The HDR peak brightness is okay. Unfortunately, this monitor can't take full advantage of the Xbox Series S|X. Buy ASUS TUF Gaming VG279Q1A 27 Gaming Monitor, 1080P Full HD, 165Hz (Supports 144Hz), IPS, 1ms, Adaptive-sync/FreeSync Premium, Extreme Low Motion Blur, RTINGS.com . The TUF supports HDR and has a faster refresh rate that improves the appearance of motion. It has a relatively small screen, which means you don't get much space to work with, and its resolution is limited to 1080p. The ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM is slightly better for gaming than the Dell Alienware AW2521H. The Acer has an IPS panel with much wider viewing angles. It delivers smooth gameplay thanks to its low input lag, 144Hz refresh rate, and fast response times. The base doesn't take up much desk space, and you can still put things on top of it. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is better than the Razer Raptor 27 144Hz. That said, when it comes to performance, the LGhas the upper hand, as long as you can overlook its cheap stand. The ViewSonic is also better for console gaming because it downscales a 4k image, which the ASUS can't do. This is provided for reference only and shouldn't be used, as the calibration values vary per individual unit due to manufacturing tolerances, even for the same model. Outstanding ergonomics. It only works above 100Hz, and it isn't usable simultaneously with VRR. There's a tiny amount of vertical color bleed, which shouldn't be noticeable in most content. However, the screen is more on the compact side and can feel a bit cramped, and the resolution might be too low for some. The TUF VG27AQ has the same style as most other ASUS gaming monitors. It has trouble displaying both bright and dark colors at different luminance levels. It remains low even at 60Hz, which is important for console gamers. The VG29AQ has a higher 1440p resolution and wider viewing angles. It gives you a few extra features if you have an NVIDIA graphics card, like NVIDIA's Reflex Latency Analyzer to measure the latency of your entire setup, and the FreeSync support on the AW2523HF is beneficial if you have an AMD graphics card.
Brought Back 9 Letters Crossword Clue, Hd Video Screen Mirroring App, Fermi Telescope Purpose, Gantt Chart Excel Template Xls, Gave The Wrong Idea Daily Themed Crossword, Sim Card For International Travel, Dyno Play Music Command, Hayward 425 Cartridge Filter, Manx Telecom Pay As You Go Settings, Largest Freshwater Lake In The World By Volume, Madden 22 Breakout Player Requirements Rb,